The Global Warming Hoax

It is a correct answer that is harder to come by, quite often due to a single person. The two sections below show how one thing is confused with another. This hoax is certainly not "established science". Section 2 shows how garbage-in/garbage-out computer runs are done.

Global warming is a measurement of thermal pollution, that is, selective measurements near certain large cities. If Ontario nuclear reactors generate 7,000 megawatts, the thermal pollution would heat Niagara Falls about 2 degrees C, assuming a flow of a million liters per second. This has nothing to do with carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, aside from the fact that it is less soluable in warm water. Thermal pollution (heating of rives and lakes) will be more noticable in northern regions; and it is due to unlimited immigration, and nuclear power plants.

2. Bogus Black Body Computer Simulations

Rather lazy people have made the fantastic assertion, that slight changes in atmospheric composition will melt the polar ice caps. However, if a black body formula is modified by loose arguments; and concealed in a computer program, the green house gas hoax can be passed along as science.

The correct equation is shown, and then the perverted version. S and f are the same, referring to energy flux.

Both are the same, once the garbage is removed from the second. N and alpha are set to zero, while epsilon is set to one. Those 3 extra terms are not in any published paper, nor will they ever be. The authors (Hanson et. el.) explain,

"N can be written as the difference of these terms" This is the idea,

E = mc²

0 = mc² – E

N = mc² –E

The N = nitwit factor allows one to travel faster than the speed of light. The logic is just as flawed in the context of thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, and statistical mechanics which form the basis of black body theory.

"Alpha is the planetary reflection" Reflection is not a term used in black body radiation

"Epsilon is the effective emissivity". Emissivity is not even in the dictionary. This is the carbon dioxide factor for a political equation. Certain emissions, such as sulpur dioxide are very toxic; but a real problem tends to be overlooked by those with an agenda to manipulate.